World & I Online Magazine  
World & I School | World & I Homeschool | World & I College | World & I Library
 Username:   Password:     Subscribe   Register               About Us | Contact Us | FAQs
18-Year Archive Peoples of the World Book Review Worldwide Folktales Fathers of Faith
Search  
Sort by: Results Listed:
Date Range:    Advanced Search

Online Magazine
 
  Current Issue
Editorial
Current Issue
The Arts
Life
Natural Science
Culture
Book World
Modern Thought
  Resources
18-Year Archive
American Waves
Book Reviews
Ceremonies/Festivities
Eye on the High Court
Fathers of Faith
Footsteps of Lincoln
Millennial Moments
Peoples of the World
Profiles in Character
Teacher's Guide
Traveling the Globe
Worldwide Folktales
Writers and Writing

Conservatism and Its Discontents


Article # : 11659 

Section : MODERN THOUGHT
Issue Date : 9 / 1986  3,205 Words
Author : Edward Shapiro
Edward Shapiro is professor of history emeritus at Seton Hall University. He is completing a book on the Crown Heights (Brooklyn, New York) riot of 1991.

       A specter is haunting America - the specter of conservatism. All the powers of the old America have entered into a holy alliance to exorcise this specter: liberals and progressives, Old Leftists and New Leftists, radicals and populists. This, of course, was not supposed to happen. According to the dominant school of American historiography, the school embodied the Louis Hartz, Arthur Schlesinger, Jr., and Allen Guttmann, liberalism was the only legitimate American intellectual tradition, since America lacked the feudal, class-ridden society necessary for conservatism to take root. For American liberals, the paradox of American conservatism was that the only thing it had to conserve was the liberal tradition. The belief that conservative ideas had a place in American life was viewed as bizarre, while “a conservative American intellectual” was oxymoronic. From this perspective, conservatism was an un-American activity.
       
        Ralph Waldo Emerson's 1841 essay "The Conservative" was seemingly the last word on the nature of American conservatism. For Emerson, there was "always a certain meanness in the argument of Conservatism." It "makes no poetry, breathes no prayer, has no invention, it is all memory. It degrades whatever it touches." The extent to which Americanism and liberalism had been fused was illustrated by the refusal even of Robert A. Taft to identify himself as a conservative, preferring to call himself a liberal. Admittedly there were conservatives, but these were simply defenders of big business and white supremacy who did not need to be taken seriously intellectually.
       
        Undoubtedly the most famous recent explication of the role of conservative ideas in American culture was Lionel Trilling's introduction to his 1950 collection of essays appropriately entitled the The Liberal Imagination. Trilling, who two decades later would be recognized as a formative figure in the emergence of neoconservatism, declared:
       
        In the United States at this time liberalism is not only the dominant but even the sole intellectual tradition. For it is the plain fact that nowadays there are no conservative or reactionary ideas in general circulation. This does not mean….there is no impulse to conservatism or to reaction. Such impulses are certainly very strong, perhaps even stronger than most of us know. But the conservative impulse and the reactionary impulse do not, with some isolated and some ecclesiastical exceptions, express themselves in ideas but only the action or in irritable mental gestures which seek to resemble ideas.
       
        These words were
... Read Full Article


Look for this article in Ask.com

Copyright © 2004 The World & I. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy