World & I Online Magazine  
World & I School | World & I Homeschool | World & I College | World & I Library
 Username:   Password:     Subscribe   Register               About Us | Contact Us | FAQs
18-Year Archive Peoples of the World Book Review Worldwide Folktales Fathers of Faith
Search  
Sort by: Results Listed:
Date Range:    Advanced Search

Online Magazine
 
  Current Issue
Editorial
Current Issue
The Arts
Life
Natural Science
Culture
Book World
Modern Thought
  Resources
18-Year Archive
American Waves
Book Reviews
Ceremonies/Festivities
Eye on the High Court
Fathers of Faith
Footsteps of Lincoln
Millennial Moments
Peoples of the World
Profiles in Character
Teacher's Guide
Traveling the Globe
Worldwide Folktales
Writers and Writing

Religion and the Legitimation of Violence


Article # : 11655 

Section : MODERN THOUGHT
Issue Date : 9 / 1986  6,915 Words
Author : William R. Garrett
William R. Garrett is professor of sociology at Saint Michael's College, Colchester, Vermont. He is former president of the Association for the Sociology of Religion. His latest book is titled The Social Consequences of Religious Belief.

       Violent action undertaken in the name of religion is not a wholly new phenomenon in human affairs. Religiously legitimated wars, revolutions, pogroms, and crusades against a rival faith appear with uncanny frequency in the histories of both the Occident and the Orient. Mounting empirical evidence of the last two decade makes this conclusion incontestable: A rapidly increasing number of contemporary religionists are being inspired by the dogmas of their faith to beat their plowshares into swords.
       
        Three salient features make the recent resurgence of radical religious violence so noteworthy: (1) its extraordinary virulence at precisely that time when many interpreters were reporting a trend in international relations toward a burgeoning secularity, along with a corresponding increase in the level of civility by which major religious communities were interrelated; (2) the tendency among many exponents of contemporary radical religion to embrace a stance aptly characterize by J.L. Talmon as "totalitarian democracy"; and (3) the momentous social consequences that radical religion of a totalitarian democratic cast is capable of unleashing on believers and nonbelievers alike in the post-modern world.
       
        The Diverse Forms Of Contemporary Radical Religion
       
        A definition of terms is called for at the outset. By radical religion, we mean that coterie of true believers who (1) subscribe to a fundamentalist or orthodox understanding of the basis tenants of their religion or sect; (2) relate those religious constructs to a set of social conditions which are variously defined as exploitive, repressive, or immoral so that (3) a substantive reformation of the social order is given warrant on sacred grounds. This definition casts as sufficiently wide net to encompass Catholic members of the IRA, Druse militia in Lebanon, Sunni and Shi'ite combatants in the Iraqi-Iranian war, Catholic supporters of Solidarity's struggle in Poland, liberation theologians and their followers n Latin America and elsewhere, as well as the more activist branches of the New Religious Right in the United States.
       
        Radical religion is not cut from the same bolt of cloth everywhere, even when it appears in different societies under the aegis to the same denominational organization: Catholic radicalism in Poland, for example, is vastly different from the Catholic radicalism in Brazil. Contemporary radical religion can be divided into three basic types: (1) totalitarian right, (2) liberal democratic centrist, and (3) totalitarian
... Read Full Article


Look for this article in Ask.com

Copyright © 2004 The World & I. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy