World & I Online Magazine  
World & I School | World & I Homeschool | World & I College | World & I Library
 Username:   Password:     Subscribe   Register               About Us | Contact Us | FAQs
18-Year Archive Peoples of the World Book Review Worldwide Folktales Fathers of Faith
Search  
Sort by: Results Listed:
Date Range:    Advanced Search

Online Magazine
 
  Current Issue
Editorial
Current Issue
The Arts
Life
Natural Science
Culture
Book World
Modern Thought
  Resources
18-Year Archive
American Waves
Book Reviews
Ceremonies/Festivities
Eye on the High Court
Fathers of Faith
Footsteps of Lincoln
Millennial Moments
Peoples of the World
Profiles in Character
Teacher's Guide
Traveling the Globe
Worldwide Folktales
Writers and Writing

Does the Word 'Dog' Bite?


Article # : 11506 

Section : CULTURE
Issue Date : 10 / 1986  4,720 Words
Author : Linda Degh and Andrew Vazsonyi
Linda Degh is Distinguished Professor of Folklore at Indiana University. Her husband, Andrew Vazsonyi, was formerly the associate chairman of the Research Center for Language and Semiotic Studies at Indiana University. They have co-authored several articles. This article has been edited from "Does the word 'dog' bite? Ostensive action: A means of legend-telling" published in the Journal of Folklore Research, Bloomington, Indiana, in 1983. It is reproduced by permission.

       The visit of Halloween trick-or-treaters to American homes is a well-established custom. Neighborhood children traditionally dress up as witches, ghosts, skeletons, monsters, and other "scary" characters for a door-to-door parade. True to tradition, a mild form of prank-playing vandalism known as "tricking" is indulgently acknowledged by the adult world on this one day of the year. Indeed, Halloween is one time when a minor status reversal - the children's right to demand - is deemed acceptable behavior. In the trick-or-treat ritual, a host of monstrous, mostly supernatural, beings symbolically assault and plunder defenseless homes. They may be rendered harmless, however, by a special ritual act - giving the placatory "treat."
       
        The charm of Halloween belies its significance. Victor W. Turner, author of The Ritual Process, suggests that mild rites of age and sex-role reversal are practiced on this holiday. According to his interpretation, children attack the "authority-holding generation of householders" with tricks similar to the work of more earthly spirits (wearing mostly monster masks and costumers to secure anonymity in order to escape the consequences of tricking). They wear masks of burglars, executioners, and criminals, as well as supernatural beings.
       
        Turner also quotes Anna Freud's observation that children often pretend to be fierce animals and threatening monsters - the very objects of their own fear. "What is being given animal guise in child fantasy is the aggressive and punitive power of the parents, particularly the father." Identification with the terrifying object thus becomes an effective protection from it.
       
        Austrian psychoanalyst Richard Sterba sees another kind of inversion in child-adult encounters at Halloween. Americans suppress the idea of death and generally do not commemorate the dead. Children become surrogate executors of the conscience and "punish" this neglect.
       
        This role reversal, though it happens with adult consent, does not take place without some qualms. Several of our young informants admitted to being afraid while masquerading in scary outfits and uttering scary sounds. Halloween mummers often fear the figures that they and rival groups assume.
       
        Sadly, over the last decade and a half, the ritual of trick-or-treating has dramatically lost its popularity. Year by year fewer participate, and many treats, thoughtfully prepared by caring adults, go unclaimed. Since 1982 the practice has been largely
... Read Full Article


Look for this article in Ask.com

Copyright © 2004 The World & I. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy