World & I Online Magazine  
World & I School | World & I Homeschool | World & I College | World & I Library
 Username:   Password:     Subscribe   Register               About Us | Contact Us | FAQs
18-Year Archive Peoples of the World Book Review Worldwide Folktales Fathers of Faith
Search  
Sort by: Results Listed:
Date Range:    Advanced Search

Online Magazine
 
  Current Issue
Editorial
Current Issue
The Arts
Life
Natural Science
Culture
Book World
Modern Thought
  Resources
18-Year Archive
American Waves
Book Reviews
Ceremonies/Festivities
Eye on the High Court
Fathers of Faith
Footsteps of Lincoln
Millennial Moments
Peoples of the World
Profiles in Character
Teacher's Guide
Traveling the Globe
Worldwide Folktales
Writers and Writing

The Man Who Mistook His Wife for a Hat and Other Clinical Tales


Article # : 10966 

Section : BOOK WORLD
Issue Date : 6 / 1986  11,078 Words
Author : Oliver Sacks

       To talk of diseases is a sort of Arabian Nights entertainment.
        --William Osler
       
        The physician is concerned (unlike the naturalist) . . . with a single organism, the human subject, striving to preserve its identity in adverse circumstances.
        --Ivy McKenzie
       
        Preface
       
        "The last thing one settles in writing a book," Pascal observes, "is what one should put in first." So, having written, a title and two epigraphs, I must now examine what I have done--and why.
       
        The doubleness of the epigraphs and the contrast between them--indeed the contrast which Ivy McKenzie draws between the physician and the naturalist--corresponds to a certain doubleness in me: that I feel myself a naturalist and a physician both; and that I am equally interested in diseases and people; perhaps, too, that I am equally, if inadequately, a theorist and dramatist, am equally drawn to the scientific and the romantic, and continually see both in the human condition, not least in that quintessential human condition of sickness--animals get diseases, but only man falls radically into sickness.
       
        My work, my life, is all with the sick--but the sick and their sickness drives me to thoughts which, perhaps, I might otherwise not have. So much so that I am compelled to ask, with Nietzsche: "As for sickness: are we not almost tempted to ask whether we could get along without it?"--and to see the questions it raises as fundamental in nature. Constantly my patients drive me to question, and constantly my questions drive me to patients--thus in the stories or studies which follow there is a continual movement from one to the other.
       
        Studies, yes; why stories, or cases? Hippocrates introduced the historical conception of disease, the idea that diseases have a course, from their first intimations to their climax or crisis, and thence to their happy or fatal resolution. Hippocrates thus introduced the case history, a description, or depiction, of the natural history of disease--precisely expressed by the old word pathography. Such histories are a form of natural history--but they tell us nothing about the individual and his history; they convey nothing of the person, and experience of the person, as he faces, and struggles to survive, his disease. There is no "subject" in a narrow case history; modern
... Read Full Article


Look for this article in Ask.com

Copyright © 2004 The World & I. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy