|

|
|
| Current Issue |
|
|
| Resources |
|
|

|
The Dangerous Border
| Article
# : |
10901 |
|
|
Section : |
MODERN THOUGHT
|
| Issue
Date : |
7 / 1986 |
10,756 Words |
| Author
: |
John Hutchinson John Hutchinson is professor of industrial relations at the Graduate School of Management, UCLA. |
The migration of labor is seldom an arbiter of history. Only the movements westward from Asia into Europe during the millennium after Christ and into the United States from Europe during recent centuries seem among the great transforming migrations, the shakers of mankind. In this century, the migrations since World War II are not, with one exception, the likely messengers of global change: the mass displacement of Poles and Germans westward after 1945 took place upon the edict of the Soviet Union, and it was ordained but not ordaining; the postwar job-seekers in Western Europe from the Mediterranean region and the Commonwealth are conspicuous enough by virtue of the economic convenience and social friction they generate, but they are not--at least yet--the stuff of war or revolution. The major borders of the world are sovereign sentries, in the main, barriers to undocumented or unwelcome strangers. Not so in the Pacific Southwest of the United States. What is called the "Mexican border" has become in a short generation a semi fiction, a theory in all but cartographical matters. Now, across the border, there is taking place a migration of workers and refugees, and perhaps of revolutionaries, of such a scale and escalation in annual numbers as greatly to affect the nature and propensities of American society, certainly in the Pacific Southwest, perhaps in a generation or so in the Republic as a whole. "What we are witnessing," writes the evidently pro-Hispanic Lester D. Langley, "is the re-Hispanicization of that once-Spanish domain in North America…" The migration itself, both reopdicatly and dangerously, is a response to wanted comfort in the United States, cheap labor erodes old loyalties. But it is also from a turbulent region of constitutional and economic habits alien to those of the United States, in prospective numbers and transported heritage an agent of territorial and cultural preemption perhaps incompatible with the cohesion of the American community, and presently out of control. Now, there is in Central America and indigenous but externally subsidized insurgency at work which, if successful there, and contagious to Mexico, could provoke an onrush of tidal immigration in the multiples of annual millions, impossible to confine or absorb, certain to alter the character and example of the world's chief protector of freedom. So precipitate and organic a change is unlikely to be popular or peaceful, or for the better for either the United States or Western civilization, and could be ravaging to both. It is fair and timely to ask whether the future of the American constitutional heritage, and thus the future of the American constitutional heritage, and thus the future of the Western function, might lie in Central America and Mexico--in the stability and
...
Read Full Article
Look for this article in Ask.com
|
|