World & I Online Magazine  
World & I School | World & I Homeschool | World & I College | World & I Library
 Username:   Password:     Subscribe   Register               About Us | Contact Us | FAQs
18-Year Archive Peoples of the World Book Review Worldwide Folktales Fathers of Faith
Search  
Sort by: Results Listed:
Date Range:    Advanced Search

Online Magazine
 
  Current Issue
Editorial
Current Issue
The Arts
Life
Natural Science
Culture
Book World
Modern Thought
  Resources
18-Year Archive
American Waves
Book Reviews
Ceremonies/Festivities
Eye on the High Court
Fathers of Faith
Footsteps of Lincoln
Millennial Moments
Peoples of the World
Profiles in Character
Teacher's Guide
Traveling the Globe
Worldwide Folktales
Writers and Writing

Rethinking Defense


Article # : 10682 

Section : BOOK WORLD
Issue Date : 1 / 1986  3,253 Words
Author : Philip Gold
Philip Gold is senior fellow at the Seattle-based Discovery Institute and a frequent contributor to the Washington Times.

       MILITARY INCOMPETENCE
       Why the American Military Doesn't Win
       Richard A. Gabriel
       Hill and Wang, 1985
       208 pp., $16.95 Cloth
       
       THE PENTAGON AND THE ART OF WAR
       Edward N. Luttwak
       Simon and Schuster, 1984
       333 pp., $17.95 Cloth
       
       THE DEFENSE REFORM DEBATE
       Issues and Analysis
       Asa a. Clark IV et al, eds.
       Johns Hopkins University Press, 1984
       370 pp., $12.95 Paper
       
        Modern public discourse has an unusual trait: The whole adds up to less than the sum of its parts. And perhaps nowhere is this "reverse synergy" more apparent, and less affordable, than in the current furor over the condition of America's national defense.
       
        The formula for public stupefaction is simple enough. Start with an issue, in this case a matter at once fundamental and volatile, exceedingly complex and exceedingly expensive, and equally inseparable from the imperatives of survival and the demands of individual and international morality. Add the print and electronic media, with their incessant sniping, their ninety-second "in depth" presentations and page one "exposes," their editorial writers with raised eyebrows and TV corresponds with ominously lowered voices, their deft counter pointing of pugnacious outside experts and joyous savaging of governmental officials, and their constant invocation of the "public's right to know" whatever they choose, for whatever reasons, to tell them. Then add the ideologues, left, right, and libertarian. Now factor in those with money to make, lives to lose, offices to be elected (or re-elected) to, or Hobbesian self-righteousness to tout, and the result is less the victory of truth than a chaos of conflicting, ill-formed opinions supported less by accurate data and coherent ethical premises than by an array of weary bromides and a truly awesome tonnage of partial data, misinformation, disinformation, and just plain ignorance.
       
        Happily, however, within the past year or so, a number of first-rate studies of the defense
... Read Full Article


Look for this article in Ask.com

Copyright © 2004 The World & I. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy