Forbidden Broadway - Jeff Church'>
World & I Online Magazine  
World & I School | World & I Homeschool | World & I College | World & I Library
 Username:   Password:     Subscribe   Register               About Us | Contact Us | FAQs
18-Year Archive Peoples of the World Book Review Worldwide Folktales Fathers of Faith
Search  
Sort by: Results Listed:
Date Range:    Advanced Search

Online Magazine
 
  Current Issue
Editorial
Current Issue
The Arts
Life
Natural Science
Culture
Book World
Modern Thought
  Resources
18-Year Archive
American Waves
Book Reviews
Ceremonies/Festivities
Eye on the High Court
Fathers of Faith
Footsteps of Lincoln
Millennial Moments
Peoples of the World
Profiles in Character
Teacher's Guide
Traveling the Globe
Worldwide Folktales
Writers and Writing

D.C.'s Impish Forbidden Broadway


Article # : 10660 

Section : THE ARTS
Issue Date : 1 / 1986  815 Words
Author : Jeff Church
Jeff Church is a playwright-in-residence at The John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts Programs for Children and Youth.

       AS Washington theatergoers enter the well-mannered Marquee Lounge at the Omni Shoreham Hotel to see five players do a club-act indictment of hit musicals called Forbidden Broadway, they are expected to partake in a rather lush evening, sitting in pretty chairs, and also to submit to drink minimums. This atmosphere might be fine for a high brow collection of Noel Coward songs, but it seems ironically inappropriate to house a funny, spiteful little musical with an underlying theme concerning the dismay of off-broadway actors with the kind of thing that sells on Broadway. Now maybe the producers mean these surroundings to be the ultimate parody of the Broadway glitz we expect, but let us remain suspect.
       
        D.C.'s version of Forbidden Broadway cuts out many of the in New York theater jokes and skits and goes decidedly streamline for us mainstream folks. Mainly old standby numbers from musicals that we now see in community theater here are parodied, and to boot, we get an approximate likeness of the original performer. This is probably a marketable concession, but creator Gerard Allessandrini, insists on keeping some of the inside jokes in, and the performers feel compelled to point, indicate, and generally do what they can to cue us to get said joke. (There are a few feeble attempts to include local references to D.C.'s Peter Sellars and the American National Theater.)
       
        At times "Forbidden" seems to pit the occasional theatergoer against the diehard theater type. Act II's opening must be frustrating to the players who do some funny bits as auditionees which play to a thud before an audience who does not feel the need to yelp with appreciation at the stereotypes they present. It seems so much better when we all understand at once, as we do with the Carol Channing rib. This section plays particularly well due to the fact that it is presented as a mini-play with Dolly gesticulating part of her performance in mime as we hear the chorus boys singing their thoughts: "Oh no, Carol/Oh, no, no, Carol/Don't you dare do 'Hello Dolly' once again…"
       
        Again, while the Man of La Mancha parody is well-received ("…to sing the impossible song") Andrew Lloyd-Weber's Cats routine about an actor remembering a time when "actors played humans" misses with its big punchline, "Next, I play a caboose." The question which comes to mind at this point is whether this is a reference to the newer Weber musical about trains in which the actors wear roller skates. Critics all over the United States have lavished praise on "Forbidden"--almost unanimously--and this can only be attributed to the fact that the show seems to be written as a joke for
... Read Full Article


Look for this article in Ask.com

Copyright © 2004 The World & I. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy