World & I Online Magazine  
World & I School | World & I Homeschool | World & I College | World & I Library
 Username:   Password:     Subscribe   Register               About Us | Contact Us | FAQs
18-Year Archive Peoples of the World Book Review Worldwide Folktales Fathers of Faith
Search  
Sort by: Results Listed:
Date Range:    Advanced Search

Online Magazine
 
  Current Issue
Editorial
Current Issue
The Arts
Life
Natural Science
Culture
Book World
Modern Thought
  Resources
18-Year Archive
American Waves
Book Reviews
Ceremonies/Festivities
Eye on the High Court
Fathers of Faith
Footsteps of Lincoln
Millennial Moments
Peoples of the World
Profiles in Character
Teacher's Guide
Traveling the Globe
Worldwide Folktales
Writers and Writing

Can Africa Sustain a Free Press?


Article # : 10572 

Section : CURRENT ISSUES
Issue Date : 2 / 1986  3,831 Words
Author : David Yeats-Thomas
David Yeats-Thomas has covered Africa extensively in his career as a journalist and editor for publications in South Africa and Europe.

       There is a malaise on the African continent that has infected virtually every nation regardless of race, creed, or ideology: a chronic intolerance of an independent and critical press.
       
        The rationale for this universal contempt for free expression is shrouded in a variety of obscure rhetoric. Whatever it is called, a ruthless control of the press has become as African as coups, military dictatorships, drought, and famine.
       
        Thus, the international uproar kicked up by South Africa's latest restrictions on reporters' movements was surprising. Like it or not, South Africa, despite the hue of its government, is part of the African continent.
       
        In any case, it would be a contradiction for a police/fascist state, as South Africa is reputed to be, to have a free press, however limited. The South African government should be excused if it is bewildered by all the fuss and contraction.
       
        'Catalyst to Violence'
       
        This is not to say that the subcontinent's white rulers are not themselves past masters of obfuscation. The angry reaction of the western press to the November crackdown on reporting in South African's violence-torn areas was further aggravated by Pretoria's usual evasions. The government's main concern was with, in the words of Law and Order Minister Louis le Grange, "the presence of television and other camera crews in unrest situations which proved to be a catalyst to further violence."
       
        A chance comment by a South African police officer may be more to the point. "We cannot let anything bad about South Africa get out anymore," he told members of the press following a brief detention in December of several reporters and television crews who had been covering a political funeral in a black township. Whether the officer's words were a slip of the tongue or intentional, they accurately summed up the opinion in the South African capital and the underlying motive for acting against the press.
       
        Like the other African continental regimes, South Africa's Afrikaner government has never been, even in happier times, comfortable with an independent and critical press. Now, faced with the worst crisis in 37 years of rule, the National Party government of P.W. Botha is more convinced than ever that the local and foreign press is hostile and an enemy of white
... Read Full Article


Look for this article in Ask.com

Copyright © 2004 The World & I. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy