|
|
|
| Current Issue |
|
|
| Resources |
|
|
|
Assessing the Findings
| Article
# : |
10317 |
|
|
Section : |
Book World
|
| Issue
Date : |
12 / 1986 |
2,178 Words |
| Author
: |
Everett Carll Ladd
Everett Carll Ladd is director of the Roper Center in
Storrs, Connecticut. |
THE MEDIA ELITE: AMERICA'S NEW POWER BROKERS
S. Robert Lichter, Stanley Rothman, and Linda S. Lichter
Bethesda, Maryland: Adler and Adler, 1986
342 pp., $19.95
On occasion an argument so consumes those engaged in it that they stop trying to think things through soberly and seek only to score points. Such is the case with the long-running argument over whether the American press has a liberal bias.
The primary parties to the argument are, of course, political conservatives and the press itself. Conservatives tend to see the press and the picture of the world it purveys as disproportionately liberal and Democratic. In return, journalists often think they are unfairly picked upon and, as a defensive response, argue either that they aren't distinctively liberal at all, or that their political outlook is a trivial detail that little affects the way they do their jobs. These media claims infuriate conservatives, spurring them to sponsor or publicize studies that "prove" that the press is liberal and that its liberalism does affect reporting. Then, members of the press wonder what the conservatives really want to accomplish: If the press is "proven" to be consequentially liberal, what is to be done about it? It may be fun to listen to the name-calling for a while but not for long.
Researchers contemplating work that puts them right in the middle of the argument over press bias need to have thick skins; they are certain to be assailed whichever way they turn. When political scientist Stanley Rothman founded the Center for the Study of Social and Political Change at Smith College and decided that one of the center's first projects would be an examination of the outlook of journalists, he certainly knew what he was getting into. So did S. Robert Lichter, a George Washington University political scientist who wrote The Media Elite, the book that resulted from the study. So, of course, did Linda S. Lichter who carried out the research. Still, they must find it more than a little frustrating that their efforts, which represent honest and competent scholarship, are being dismissed by media reviewers as little more than the latest round of shelling by conservatives of journalistic redoubts.
One example of the attack is New Republic editor Michael Kinsley's broadside in The Washington Post. Kinsley calls The Media Elite "a tendentious piece of pseudoscientific rubbish of just the sort that drives
...
Read Full Article
Look for this article in Ask.com
|
|
