World & I Online Magazine  
World & I School | World & I Homeschool | World & I College | World & I Library
 Username:   Password:     Subscribe   Register               About Us | Contact Us | FAQs
18-Year Archive Peoples of the World Book Review Worldwide Folktales Fathers of Faith
Search  
Sort by: Results Listed:
Date Range:    Advanced Search

Online Magazine
 
  Current Issue
Editorial
Current Issue
The Arts
Life
Natural Science
Culture
Book World
Modern Thought
  Resources
18-Year Archive
American Waves
Book Reviews
Ceremonies/Festivities
Eye on the High Court
Fathers of Faith
Footsteps of Lincoln
Millennial Moments
Peoples of the World
Profiles in Character
Teacher's Guide
Traveling the Globe
Worldwide Folktales
Writers and Writing

Counting and Recounting Plato


Article # : 10251 

Section : MODERN THOUGHT
Issue Date : 8 / 1986  9,872 Words
Author : John Bremer
John Bremer, a Cambridge philosopher and educator, writes mostly on Plato.

       Plato is playful but he plays in many ways. In what may seem to us a most trivial way he plays with words. Wordplay and puns are as common on the dialogues as they are in the plays of Shakespeare, and they are often as labored. Scholars have tended to ignore this, merely remarking that Greek tastes obviously differed, and, by implication, differed from our more refined sensibilities. The Plato of the academics cannot be a punster, or if he is, then he should be excused and read as if he were not.
       
        The objection to Plato's playfulness, however, especially on the grounds of some imagined cultural difference, may obscure a deeper meaning contained within the wordplay and puns.
       
        Anybody who has ever heard anything at all about Plato must have heard that "he believed in ideas" or that "he had a doctrine of forms," and those who inquired further would perhaps have been told that these "ideas" or "forms" represented reality or were reality, the real, what is real, or simply (in Plato's usual terms) what is. These ideas or forms are real, and they must be contrasted with what is not fully real, with appearances which both are and are not.
       
        It has often been remarked (though not universally accepted) that Plato is careful not to develop a technical vocabulary in the dialogues. If the ideas or forms are linguistically confusing to the modern reader without classical Greek, it may be observed that they are equally confusing to the reader with classical Greek. Plato varies his use of terms so that what often appears uniformly in English translation as "idea" may be one of several different Greek words Plato uses variously. This may be difficult at one level if the reader of the dialogues cannot develop the habit of looking for the meaning behind a word that is a member of a group of words. At another level, it suggests to the thoughtful listener or reader the need to see through a metaphorical matrix that Plato provides to the meaning lying beyond.
       
        One of the words Plato is fond of using is the word eidos, usually translated as "idea" or "form." But Plato is playing with the words, with us, and with what is, because the word is derived from the Greek word eidon, which generally means "to see" and in the perfect tense means "to know." It also has a technical meaning in medicine as "symptom." Plato is paradoxically saying that the eidos of something, the form or idea of it, as the translators say, the "whatever it is that makes it what it is and not something else," is not an appearance, not something we see but an un-seeable symptom, an
... Read Full Article


Look for this article in Ask.com

Copyright © 2004 The World & I. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy