World & I Online Magazine  
World & I School | World & I Homeschool | World & I College | World & I Library
 Username:   Password:     Subscribe   Register               About Us | Contact Us | FAQs
18-Year Archive Peoples of the World Book Review Worldwide Folktales Fathers of Faith
Search  
Sort by: Results Listed:
Date Range:    Advanced Search

Online Magazine
 
  Current Issue
Editorial
Current Issue
The Arts
Life
Natural Science
Culture
Book World
Modern Thought
  Resources
18-Year Archive
American Waves
Book Reviews
Ceremonies/Festivities
Eye on the High Court
Fathers of Faith
Footsteps of Lincoln
Millennial Moments
Peoples of the World
Profiles in Character
Teacher's Guide
Traveling the Globe
Worldwide Folktales
Writers and Writing

Does Media Shape Public Opinion?


Article # : 10215 

Section : CURRENT ISSUES
Issue Date : 8 / 1986  1,420 Words
Author : William Livingstone
William Livingstone is a writer on media and public policy based in Washington, D.C.

       Since the Sandinista victory over General Anastasio Somoza in July 1979, the media have actively charted Daniel Ortega's rise to power and the growing military threat Nicaragua poses to neighboring democracies. The question arises naturally as to what influence the media have exercised in the debate on Nicaragua. Have daily editorials that have pilloried President Reagan's policy of containment in the Western Hemisphere swayed public opinion? What has been the impact, if any, of television newscasts showing Nicaraguan soldiers mobilizing for war, images which are reminiscent of Vietnam?
       
        The rules of foreign policy debate have been altered by technology. In the past, discussions of our relations with foreign governments were conducted primarily by officials in the Department of State and the White House, with only minimal public discourse. Few members of Congress had the necessary expertise or inclination to contribute to the making of foreign policy. The media reported on the announcements of the president and secretary of state, often voicing dissent, but with minimal influence compared to the power they wield today.
       
        From the moment Reagan entered office, the eye of the camera has doggedly traced the growing conflict in Central America. The advent of minicameras and portable satellite uplink stations now makes it as easy to broadcast live pictures from downtown Managua or the jungles in El Salvador as it is to receive a video picture from across town.
       
        It is no wonder, given the recent developments in broadcasting, that the polemics of American foreign policy are hotly debated daily on television. When high U.S. government officials articulate policy decisions, foreign leaders such as Daniel Ortega and Jose Napoleon Duarte are immediately given the opportunity to respond on live broadcasts. Every facet and statement receives close scrutiny and editorial judgment.
       
        Television has become so much a part of our culture that it is the primary means of communication between countries. Instead of sending a carefully written demarche to a foreign government, an official merely walks into a studio and makes a statement on a morning television news program. Instantly, the world is appraised of a new policy decision.
       
        There are no formulas for measuring concisely the impact of media on public opinion and its subsequent effect on the evolution of American foreign policy. Somewhere in the neighborhood of 50 million Americans daily watch the
... Read Full Article


Look for this article in Ask.com

Copyright © 2004 The World & I. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy