|
|
|
| Current Issue |
|
|
| Resources |
|
|
|
Lost Opportunities From Chernobyl
| Article
# : |
10198 |
|
|
Section : |
CURRENT ISSUES
|
| Issue
Date : |
8 / 1986 |
1,820 Words |
| Author
: |
Rosalyn S. Yalow
Rosalyn Yalow is a nuclear physicist whose work on nuclear
medicine won her the Nobel Prize for physiology or medicine in
1977. She is senior medical investigator at the Veterans
Administration Medical Center in the Bronx, N.Y. |
The secretive Soviet handling of information about the Chernobyl reactor accident regrettably prevents the scientific world from participating in what would have been an important learning experience concerning reactor safety and radiation biology.
The failure of the Soviets to have provided details about the design of the reactor, the nature of the containment vessel, if any, the cause of the violent explosion, and the precipitating episode makes it difficult to determine whether the accident holds any lessons for American reactors.
However, of even greater concern to me is that this very unfortunate accident could have permitted an enormous increase in our knowledge in the field of radiation biology: the immediate and long-term consequences associated with exposure to radiation at different doses and dose rates.
Much of what we have learned about late radiation effects in humans has come from the Hiroshima-Nagasaki experience. Even now, 40 years afterward, attempts are being made to recalculate the acute radiation doses received by the 82,000 survivors. Certainly, retrospective analysis could never provide the accurate dosimetry that would now be possible if one could study the population in the environs of the Chernobyl reactor.
Based on the studies of the Atomic Bomb Casualty Commission (ABCC) and its successor, the Radiation Effects Research Foundation (RERF), it has been estimated that, added to the 4,500 cancer deaths normally expected through 1978 among the Japanese survivors had they not received radiation from the bomb, there were only 250 extra cancer deaths that could be attributed to their mean external radiation dose of about 25 rem (250 times natural yearly background radiation).
When effects are so small, the addition of new information with accurate dosimetry and prospective follow-up of the exposed population would be highly significant.
Although the Soviets have not been communicative, it is obvious that a substantial group received exposures in the 400-1,000 rem range or they would not have been chosen for bone marrow transplantation.
Follow-up studies needed
Did the USSR have the facilities to determine the radiation doses and
...
Read Full Article
Look for this article in Ask.com
|
|
