World & I Online Magazine  
World & I School | World & I Homeschool | World & I College | World & I Library
 Username:   Password:     Subscribe   Register               About Us | Contact Us | FAQs
18-Year Archive Peoples of the World Book Review Worldwide Folktales Fathers of Faith
Search  
Sort by: Results Listed:
Date Range:    Advanced Search

Online Magazine
 
  Current Issue
Editorial
Current Issue
The Arts
Life
Natural Science
Culture
Book World
Modern Thought
  Resources
18-Year Archive
American Waves
Book Reviews
Ceremonies/Festivities
Eye on the High Court
Fathers of Faith
Footsteps of Lincoln
Millennial Moments
Peoples of the World
Profiles in Character
Teacher's Guide
Traveling the Globe
Worldwide Folktales
Writers and Writing

The Metaphysics of the Good


Article # : 10059 

Section : MODERN THOUGHT
Issue Date : 4 / 1986  8,982 Words
Author : Ivor Leclerc
Ivor Leclerc is Fuller E. Callaway Professor of Metaphysics and Moral Philosophy, Emeritus, Emory University.

       In the inquiry into this topic it is desirable at the outset to enter into some linguistic examination, for this will facilitate, not only the avoidance of possible confusions because of the diversity of senses in which the word "good" is used, but also the recognition of where exactly life the philosophical issues with respect to the "good."
       
        In its predominant usage the word "good" (as also agathos, bonus, and their cognates in modern European languages) is an adjective, but the English word, on which we will here concentrate, sometimes also occurs in an adverbial and in a substantial usage. The Oxford English Dictionary (O.E.D.) defines good as: "The most general adj. of commendation, implying the existence of a high, or at least satisfactory, degree of characteristic qualities which significance in this are: (1) the generality of the adjective; (2) that it is one of "commendation"; (3) that the object of the commendation is certain "characteristic qualities"; (4) that the adjective does not connote the attribution of the qualities absolutely, but rather relatively, comparatively, in degree; and (5) that the qualities are distinguishable in respect to being admirable either (a) in themselves, or (b) as useful for some purpose.
       
        In this characterization of the adjective its philosophical relevance is signified by its generality. But wherein exactly that generality lies becomes a question. Does it pertain to the factor of "commendation," or to the "qualities"? It might be to the former, since the word "good" always implies "commendation." But on the other hand, "good" also carries the connotation of the qualities in question being ones of "worth," i.e., they are "worthy of commendation." That is to say, it is the qualities which, by their "worth," elicit the commendation. However, to pursue this we have to take account of some complications in regard to the meaning of the word "good."
       
        Some of this comes to the fore in an examination of the word "worth." "Worth" means "having a specified value," originally a pecuniary value, the word later coming also to be used in a generalized sense of "the relative value of a thing in respect of its qualities of the estimation in which it is held." Highly relevant here is the word "value," a synonym of "worth"--more especially relevant because of the prominence of this word in philosophical discussions of the "good." The noun "value"--deriving from the Old French valu, past participate of valoir (from Latin valere, "to be strong") meaning "to be strong, to be of worth"--in its earliest usage in English meant the amount of some commodity, medium of exchange etc. which renders it of
... Read Full Article


Look for this article in Ask.com

Copyright © 2004 The World & I. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy