World & I Online Magazine  
World & I School | World & I Homeschool | World & I College | World & I Library
 Username:   Password:     Subscribe   Register               About Us | Contact Us | FAQs
18-Year Archive Peoples of the World Book Review Worldwide Folktales Fathers of Faith
Search  
Sort by: Results Listed:
Date Range:    Advanced Search

Online Magazine
 
  Current Issue
Editorial
Current Issue
The Arts
Life
Natural Science
Culture
Book World
Modern Thought
  Resources
18-Year Archive
American Waves
Book Reviews
Ceremonies/Festivities
Eye on the High Court
Fathers of Faith
Footsteps of Lincoln
Millennial Moments
Peoples of the World
Profiles in Character
Teacher's Guide
Traveling the Globe
Worldwide Folktales
Writers and Writing

From Crisis to Abundance: Oil Strikes Back


Article # : 10046 

Section : CURRENT ISSUES
Issue Date : 4 / 1986  1,322 Words
Author : Richard H. Fink
Richard H. Fink is an associate professor of economics at George Mason University and president of Citizens for a Sound Economy.

       Six years ago if someone had predicted oil prices would fall below $15 per barrel in 1986, they likely would have been laughed out of town. Starting with the 1973 embargo, some conservationists, no-growth advocates, and certain politicians contended that the world was running out of oil. Regardless of OPEC, these seers contended, energy supplies should be rationed, speed limits should be lowered, synthetic or alternative fuels needed to be developed, and prices had to be regulated. The energy crisis had become "the moral equivalent of war."
       
        As pessimistic as these predictions were, they were not the most gloomy scenarios offered about world oil. Some analysts even broached the possibility of $100 per barrel of oil. Although prices stabilized somewhat in the early part of this decade, the price per barrel was still well over $30. Furthermore, energy "experts" predicted prices would resume their upward march. Billions were spent on developing synthetic fuels, and the federal government created the framework of a gas rationing system that would have cost taxpayers $2 billion a year to administer.
       
        An underlying theme in these arguments was that the free market could not be relied upon to allocate resources. Market critics contended that "greedy" corporations and OPEC nations made normal considerations inapplicable. It was the responsibility of government to step in and ensure that the world ran out of energy in an equitable manner.
       
        Rules without age: supply and demand
       
        Needless to say, the "era of limits" is no more. What happened to change matters so dramatically? The key factor was the old-fashioned economic rules of supply and demand. Contrary to the assertion that energy "needs" were independent of price, world consumers sharply lowered their consumption of energy. Oil demand in the industrialized nations is roughly 20 percent lower than it was in 1979. U.S. oil consumption dropped from 6.3 billion barrels in 1973 to 5.7 billion barrels in 1984.
       
        The lower demand for oil undercut OPEC's ability to control the price. Even more significant, at least in terms of immediate results, was the changing supply conditions. The jump in oil prices in the 1970s induced sharp increases in exploration and production in several non-OPEC countries. In 1974, OPEC provided 55 percent of the world's oil supplies. Today OPEC only accounts for 30 percent of world oil
... Read Full Article


Look for this article in Ask.com

Copyright © 2004 The World & I. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy